We go into the 1975 season with 32 owners. While that may not seem like something to celebrate on the surface, look around MFN. Some public leagues are barely half full. Some user-created leagues already have a dozen or more openings. One user-created league doesn't even know what has happened to its commissioner. So, I think that having a full league is a great thing. We want to take steps to promote retention, because retention leads to stability and also leads to rivalries built up over time that provoke user interest even further.
I am glad to have the mentoring committee in place, and am going to encourage even more interaction between them and less experienced coaches. I have already heard of a couple instances where this has proven very helpful to the new coach.
Loftusranger |
I had some ideas for what the blog might look like going forward, and Loftusranger sent me a few additional ideas that I really liked, so thanks to him. Some of these ideas are meant to encourage participation from as many coaches as possible, another goal we strive to reach around here. Here are some concepts:
- Game highlights, similar to last season
- Coach predictions
- Coach profiles
- Rookie report
- Statistical trends
Welcome
Let's welcome the new coaches.- Memphis Showboats, MGRIFFIN1
- Florida Blazers, Shiftywxm
- Orlando Renegades, taylorman88ca
Riches to Rags
Georgia Force cheerleaders celebrate tribewriter being named head coach |
The Draft
Linebacker Fernando Stone of Iowa was taken by the Charlotte Hornets with the first pick of the 1975 draft. Stone has 85 speed, 85 acceleration, 100 strength, 100 intelligence and 100 potentials for tackle ability, pass rush, run defense, and man-to-man coverage. We think the fans in Charlotte will love this guy.
The topic of a really poor draft class was discussed on the league forums at length. I wasn't surprised at being ready to just go nuts and chase high-volatility players early in the third round. What really surprised me was how many coaches had already beaten me to it. Let's look at how high some high-vol players went:
1-5, Juan Bonnett, SS, Houston, 94
1-6, Matthew McGinley, RDE, Washington, 78
1-7, Patrick Hiebert, RB, Oklahoma, 66
1-10, Kenneth Kurtz, LG, Orlando, 84
1-12, Laverne Ashlock, DT, Philadelphia, 82
1-16, Jacob Dunson, SLB, Honolulu, 72
1-17, Anthony Kent, RDE, Shreveport, 94
1-21, Les Lynch, DT, Baltimore, 84
1-24, Marshall Yingling, LG, Detroit, 98
1-29, Norman Paulk, DE, Portland, 94
So, by my count, that is 10 players with VOL of 65 or more that went in the first round.
This brings us to the risk/reward proposition. Is it better to go for a guy who may actually achieve his potential and become an All-Pro? Or, is it better to avoid having wasted a first-round pick on a guy who went bust and now sits on the end of your bench? It's a conversation worth having.